Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Hypocrite

Remember these words of wisdom? Now fast forward, who has been caught issuing personal loans to himself or herself? Does the name John E Samuelsen ring a bell? Or Ms. Benita Johnson or Ms. Roxanne Rotgers - don't take our words for it. Ask Stephen A Downs he is a person who indulges in hypocrisy. He has an excellent explanation in which he will inform you the U.S. Department of Labor Form LM-2 Labor Organizational Annual Report is wrong. Rather you should not believe your own eyes but instead proceed to the optometrist for corrective lenses. He will add that is not our money which John E Samuelsen awarded himself but instead is a loan. In addition he will turn it into the TWU International vendetta against John E Samuelsen. He will equate it to something like Robin Hood taking from the riches to help the poor. In his view it makes no sense to address one and destabilize a viable TWU Local 100 thus creating more problems. Have we learned nothing about financial shenanigans.
Toussaint got us a 3% raise for 2006. For the same year, he gave himself a 17% increase. In 2007, when our wages went up 4%, Toussaint gave himself a 7% boost. He went from $91,920 in 2006 to $115,475 ($141,928 after expenses) in 2008. (Don’t take our word for it, go to www.tbou2009.organd click on the link to the Union’s financial report.)
Toussaint was generous to his friends, too. Ed Watt was up 22% from 2006 to 2008. Curtis Tate got an 8.2% boost from 2007 to 2008. And Brian Clarke got an 11% bump for the same year.
All of this happened despite layoffs of clerical staff and Toussaint supposedly imposing a 10% pay cut on the officers and staff in 2007 when the dues check-off was lost. And it happened despite the Local by-laws limiting raises for officers and staff to the same percentage increase negotiated for members at the TA.It's time for them to go ,vote the entire Take Back Our Union (TBOU) Slate.
Steve Downs Chair, T/O Division of TWU Local 100

Do you believe John E Samuelsen statements:
‘I do want to make two things clear: I did not borrow money from the Union and I always returned all unused advances.’
or do you believe U.S. Department of Labor Form LM-2 Labor Organizational Annual Report below?



SCHEDULE 2 - LOANS RECEIVABLE
FILE NUMBER: 003-424

List below loans to officers, employees, or members which at any time during the reporting period exceeded $250 and list all loans to business enterprises regarless of amount. 
(A)
Loans 
Outstanding at 
Start of Period 
(B)
Loans Made 
During Period 
(C)
Cash 
(D)(1)
Other Than Cash 
(D)(2)
Loans 
Outstanding at 
End of Period 
(E)
Name: John Samuelson
Purpose: Personal Loan
Security: none
Terms: as able
$0
$1,297
$1,159
$0
$138
Name: Benita Johnson
Purpose: Personal Loan
Security: none
Terms: as able
$0
$669
$362
$0
$307
Name: Roxanne Rotger
Purpose: Personal Loan
Security: none
Terms: as able
$0
$8,474
$7,865
$0
$609
Total of loans not listed above




$0
Total of all lines
$0
$10,440
$9,386
$0
$1,054
Totals will be automatically entered in...
Item 24 
Column (A)
Item 61
Item 45
Item 69 
with Explanation
Item 24 
Column (B)

Form LM-2 (Revised 2003)

1 comment:

  1. Wake up on the wrong side of the bed this morning? I think you should re-red that LM2 before you start the name calling.
    all monies are classified as loans (something you dispute)
    all monies expect $138 was paid back (which is different than an award as you put it)

    So you have run out of "funds" to attack.
    all found to be legit.
    JS stood up for those college point drivers and actually hired them, until they got their jobs back.
    Lock-Box is on it's way.
    So we're back to the LM2s?

    if you check your math you're wrong there too.

    ReplyDelete