The premise of the paper is the difference between the private and the public sector employees. It states that the public sector unions have unlimited resources in tax dollars from tax payers whereas the private unions are hindered with limited resources and thus are not well compensated. We find that to be not accurate because private corporations put the blue collar at the bottom of the earning pyramid.
This adjunct is full of erroneous premises he intentionally ignore the private corporations earning pyramid is as follows: the top earners are the executive, then the top tier management, then the share holders, then the white collar and lastly the blue collar who are at the bottom of that pyramid. We were appalled that he could not see how the share holders and blue collar are taken advantage of by those on the executive level. Those at the executive level earn an unimaginable ratio of compensation compared to the blue collar, while their corporations have to ask for bailout money from the tax payers that did not irk him, only the public sector unions do what a shame.
This adjunct his sole point is that the public sector unions are connected to the politicians and they get what they want but we find that theory to be flawed. His example that he used in his paper is based on In Bell, Calif. (population 37,000) where the residents were furious to learn that the city manager had compensation of $1.5 million and that many other municipal employees had outrageous salaries. Those happen to be white collar and not blue collar workers. We believe he would be relieved to know that mayor Bloomberg earns a dollar for a year however his private company value has grown at an incredible level after becoming a mayor - while the blue collar salaries have seen no raises, that fact alone contradicts his claims, inaddition he completely ignores the to indicate the constant rise of the prices and the cost of living. This adjunct wants those republicans in Indiana to flex their muscle against all the blue collar workers which is not right. We hope they do not listen to him.
No comments:
Post a Comment