By Megan Gannon
November 24, 2014
Long-term exposure to triclosan — an
antibacterial ingredient found in some soap, toothpaste and other common
household products — may lead to liver cancer in mice, according to a new
study.
The finding, published Nov. 17 in the
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, comes amid closer scrutiny of
the possible health effects of the widely used substance.
“Triclosan’s
increasing detection in environmental samples and its increasingly broad use in
consumer products may overcome its moderate benefit and present a very real
risk of liver toxicity for people, as it does in mice,” Robert Tukey, a
professor at the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, said in a statement.
In the study, Tukey and colleagues gave mice
food or drinking water containing triclosan for six months. They found that
compared with control groups, the mice exposed to triclosan were more
susceptible to liver tumors.
Triclosan may interfere with the constitutive
androstane receptor, a protein that helps flush chemicals out of the body, the
authors said. In response to this disruption, excess liver cells might
proliferate, and with continued exposure, these excess cells might eventually
become tumors.
The mice in the study were exposed to higher
concentrations of triclosan than a typical person might encounter. But the
results suggest that people exposed to triclosan over long periods might be at
risk of liver damage, although more research is needed to see whether this is
the case, the study researchers said.
Triclosan
was developed as an antibacterial ingredient for use in a surgical scrub
but is now found in cosmetics and such household products as disinfectants,
plastic kitchenware, soap and detergent.
As the substance has become more common in
products, it has also emerged in the environment. Triclosan is among the seven
most frequently detected compounds in streams across the United States, and it
has been detected in the urine and breast milk of large portions of the
population, the authors said.
Triclosan’s
effects on people are not well understood. The Food and Drug Administration’s Web
site says,
“Triclosan is not currently known to be hazardous to humans. But several
scientific studies have come out . . . that merit further review.” Animal studies have hinted
at potential harms. Triclosan has been found to disrupt hormones in animals such as
frogs. Two years ago, a study showed that triclosan exposure impaired muscle
function in mice and fish.
Regulators
and lawmakers have taken note. In May, Minnesota became the first state to pass
a law banning triclosan, though
that rule won’t go into effect until 2017.
In
December 2013, the FDA issued a proposal that would require makers of
antibacterial soaps to show that their products are safe to use on a
daily basis and that they work better than simple soap and water. Despite the
wide use of antibacterial soaps, there is no evidence that these products are
more effective than regular soap at preventing illness, the FDA
said. Worse, these products may be contributing to the rise of antibiotic
resistance, according to the FDA.
“I think [the new study] is a further reason
to evaluate the use of triclosan in everyday products, which expose large
populations,” said Stuart Levy, director of the Center for Adaptation Genetics
and Drug Resistance at Tufts University in Boston, who was not involved in the
research.
The
type of cancer that the mice in the study developed, called hepatocellular
carcinoma, is the third-leading cause of cancer deaths
worldwide. Levy noted that the disease is relatively uncommon in the
United States. Most cases of hepatocellular carcinoma are caused by chronic
hepatitis B and C infections.
No comments:
Post a Comment