By Alan Greenblatt
February 13, 2017
Several states have already passed
right-to-work laws this year -- and their reach may finally expand into the
Northeast.
This week, New Hampshire could become the
first state in the Northeast to pass a right-to-work law. But even its
supporters aren't betting that it will happen.
"If we're successful, it will be with a
handful of votes," said Dave Juvet, senior vice president of the Business
& Industry Association of New Hampshire, which supports the legislation.
"There's significant opposition from Democrats in the House but also a
significant number of Republicans I would characterize as pro-labor or
pro-union."
The state Senate narrowly passed a
right-to-work bill last month, but the state House Labor Committee voted to
reject it last week. Nevertheless, a vote of the full House is scheduled for
Thursday. Gov. Chris Sununu, a Republican elected in November, supports the
legislation.
In right-to-work states, employees don't
have to pay union dues, even if their workplace is represented by unions. There
are now 28 states with right-to-work laws on the books, the most recent being enacted in Missouri last week and
Kentucky last month.
If right-to-work fails in New Hampshire, it
will be a rare setback. The issue was essentially moribund for half a century,
but six states have passed right-to-work laws over the past five years.
"Twenty-five years ago, right-to-work
was not a marquee issue, but support has been steadily growing," said Mark
Mix, president of the National Right to Work Committee. "The battle over
public-sector unionization in Wisconsin helped set the table for this."
In 2011, Gov. Scott Walker and other
Wisconsin Republicans pushed through a law that stripped collective bargaining
rights from most government workers. Union membership in the state, which
represented 14 percent of workers in 2011, had plummetted to 8 percent in 2015.
Right-to-work has become almost a foregone
conclusion when the GOP takes full control over the political branches of a
state government. A national bill has been introduced in Congress, where
Republicans hold the majorities, but Democrats would be certain to filibuster
if it reaches the Senate floor.
"Republicans know it's in their
interest to weaken the biggest institution that supports
Democrats," said Ross Eisenbrey, vice president of the pro-union
Economic Policy Institute.
Right-to-work laws hurt unions by creating a
"free rider" problem. Workers can reap the rewards of unionization,
including wages and benefits set by collective bargaining agreements, without
having to pay dues.
Where right-to-work laws exist, union
membership is generally lower. In Michigan, for example,
14.4 percent of the workforce belongs to a union -- down from about 20 percent
at the start of the decade. The state passed a right-to-work law in 2013.
Of course, union membership had already been
in decline, partially due to globalization moving many union jobs overseas. In
1960, close to 50 percent of Michigan's workforce belonged to a union.
But, said Gary Chaison, a professor of
industrial relations at Clark University, "right-to-work laws result in a
further loss of members, and because union dues are the primary source of union
revenue, the decline continues and unions cannot afford to organize new
members."
Union membership isn't dropping in every
right-to-work state, though. Mix, the National Right to Work Committee
president, pointed out that it increased last year in five right-to-work
states.
Right-to-work supporters also argue that
this approach aids the economy. Juvet said that many companies won't locate in
a state that doesn't have a right-to-work law. But, in fact, economic growth in
states without right-to-work laws often outpaces growth in states that have
them.
"They made people believe that all of
these jobs were going to rush into West Virginia when it passed," said
state Rep. Mike Caputo, a longtime union organizer. "That certainly hasn't
happened."
Maybe one reason it hasn't happened is that
the law there has yet to take effect. The law has been blocked since its
passage last year, due to a pending court challenge.
Unions are also hoping to block the
right-to-work in Missouri. They have begun collecting signatures for a veto
referendum that would be put before voters next year. If they can gather
roughly 140,000 signatures by the end of August, the law would be put on hold
until voters have their say.
But unions everywhere know they're fighting
an uphill battle.
Last week, an attorney in California filed a
lawsuit against the SEIU on behalf of government workers who don't want to pay
dues that go toward political activities. This signals that union foes will
continue pressing their case in court.
The issue has already reached the U.S.
Supreme Court, which deadlocked, 4-4, in a case last year that
would have stripped public employee unions of their ability to demand fees from
nonunion members. But the result could be different in a similar case before a
full, conservative-leaning court.
No comments:
Post a Comment