Monday, November 30, 2015

Will Lincolnshire take on labor unions by establishing right-to-work zone?


  • Lincolnshire officials are considering adopting an ordinance that would prohibit employers from forcing workers to pay union dues. It's a provision of Gov. Bruce Rauner's controversial turnaround agenda for the state.
      Lincolnshire officials are considering adopting an ordinance that would prohibit employers from forcing workers to pay union dues. It's a provision of Gov. Bruce Rauner's controversial turnaround agenda for the state.
    Paul Valade | Staff Photographer, 2013
  • Elizabeth Brandt
     Elizabeth Brandt
Months after formally endorsing Gov. Bruce Rauner's controversial turnaround agenda for Illinois, Lincolnshire officials are going further by moving to establish the town as a right-to-work zone.
Trustees are considering an ordinance that would prevent local employers from automatically deducting union dues from workers' paychecks. Eliminating that mandatory deduction means workers couldn't be fired if they choose not to pay union dues or fees.
It's a key tenet of Rauner's economic plan, which critics have bashed as anti-union or anti-worker.
Rauner and his allies have said the proposals in the turnaround agenda, including the one that calls for what the governor termed "employee empowerment zones," give people more local control over their lives.
But labor unions, including the Illinois Federation of Teachers, say the governor's plan would result in lower wages, increased unemployment and decreased union membership, among other concerns.
Additionally, Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan has issued a formal opinion that municipal right-to-work zones aren't allowed under federal law.
Lincolnshire's trustees discussed the proposal this week and could formally adopt the plan at their Dec. 14 meeting, Village Manager Brad Burke said.
Mayor Elizabeth Brandt is championing the proposal. Brandt enthusiastically backed Rauner's overall turnaround plan in May, too.
"I want to give (this) 100-percent support," she said at the time.
Brandt didn't respond to multiple interview requests about the new measure this week.
The proposed ordinance would apply to people working for private companies and not government employees.
Voluntary payroll deductions for union dues still would be allowed.
Anyone who violates the ordinance could be charged with a misdemeanor and be fined or jailed if convicted, according to the proposal.
Lincolnshire likely is among the first towns in the North or Northwest suburbs to consider creating a right-to-work zone. Burke said he's unaware of any other village board taking such a step.
Likewise, few suburbs have joined Lincolnshire in endorsing Rauner's turnaround plan, which also calls for minimum wage reform, tax freezes, political term limits, lawsuit reforms and other proposals. Round Lake Beach, Third Lake, East Dundee and Elk Grove Village are among the other towns backing Rauner's agenda.
Conversely, Mundelein, Libertyville, Wauconda, Vernon Hills, Naperville and many other communities have rejected the proposal, opted not to vote after discussing the matter or decided not to bring it up for debate at all.
Several suburban officials said the issues should be addressed in the state Capitol, not village boardrooms.
That was especially the case after Madigan's March announcement that some elements in Rauner's plan are illegal. She specifically targeted the proposed right-to-work zones, saying federal labor law allows such policies to be enacted only on a statewide basis.
The Illinois Policy Institute -- a nonprofit research group that focuses on economic and government issues -- disagrees. It endorses the right-to-work concept and says Illinois law doesn't prevent home-rule communities, such as Lincolnshire, from adopting such ordinances.
But in an informational booklet on right-to-work zones given to Lincolnshire trustees before their discussion Monday, the group also said municipalities should be prepared for court challenges.
"If Illinois local governments start passing Right-to-Work ordinances, the unions will almost certainly file lawsuits against one or more of them," the group's report said.
When asked for his opinion of Lincolnshire's proposal and the potential legal risks, village attorney Adam Simon said officials are relying on the Illinois Policy Institute's analysis. He declined to comment further.
Lincolnshire Trustee Tom McDonough told the Daily Herald he was unaware Madigan had questioned the legality of right-to-work zones in Illinois. He called the plan fair for workers, labor unions and taxpayers.
"It's not fair (to say) 'You don't want to be in the union, too bad, you have to be in the union,'" McDonough said. "If you don't want to join, you don't have to join."
Even so, McDonough said officials will review the potential for litigation before voting.

Kentucky labor unions try to slow right-to-work momentum

NOW PLAYING
Tea Party favorite Matt Bevin wins KY governor's race
Kentucky labor leaders are trying to slow the state’s momentum toward a right-to-work law that would let Kentuckians opt out of paying union dues. 
With Republican Gov.-elect Matt Bevin taking office in about two weeks, circumstances aren’t rolling in union bosses’ favor. Bevin was elected by a nine-point margin after campaigning on making Kentucky a right-to-work state. 
Republicans control the Kentucky Senate, and the Democratic majority in the Kentucky House shrank to six when Louisville Rep. Denny Butler switched parties. 
Kentucky Senate President Robert Stivers told the Louisville Courier-Journal more than a dozen other House Democrats have flirted with the idea of jumping ship. Kentucky House Speaker Greg Stumbo is a firm opponent of right-to-work. 
Because all of the House members hoping to remain in office are up for re-election next November, Bevin’s big victory will loom over Democrats during the state legislative session starting Jan. 5. 

Union Members Hold Memorial for 33 Victims of Sunken Ship

Florida Marks Record of 10 Years Without Major Hurricane

Sunday, November 29, 2015

Clinton pitches major investment in infrastructure

Clinton pitches major investment in infrastructure

U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton greets the crowd outside a campaign rally at Faneuil Hall in Boston, Massachusetts November 29, 2015.
REUTERS
BOSTON, Mass. -- On her first day back on the campaign trail since Thanksgiving, Hillary Clinton announced Sunday her plan to boost federal investment in infrastructure by $275 billion if she is elected president.
"To build a strong economy for our future," Clinton said, standing on stage at Boston's storied Faneuil Hall, "we must start by building strong infrastructure today."
Clinton, speaking alongside Boston Mayor and former labor leader Marty Walsh at an event marking the launch of "Hard Hats for Hillary," said her infrastructure proposal is just the beginning of her larger plan to put Americans back to work.
"I don't have to tell you what a sorry state we're in," she said. "Our roads and bridges are potholed and crumbling. Families endure blackouts because our electric grid fails in extreme weather."
Clinton's proposal would dedicate $250 billion to direct federal investment in roads, airports and public transit across the country, according to a campaign aide. The remaining $25 billion would go into a national infrastructure bank, or "Strategic Infrastructure Bank."
The bank would "support an additional $225 billion in direct loans, loan guarantees, and other forms of credit enhancement," said the aide, bringing Clinton's planned total investment up to $500 billion over a period of five years.
The campaign plans to release more details about Clinton's plan on Monday.
Over the next several weeks, Clinton will roll out additional proposals that focus on job creation, including investments in research and manufacturing. According to her campaign, Clinton's focus on these areas is rooted in studies that show workers in these industries earn wages that are higher than the average American worker.
In recent weeks, national labor unions have coalesced around Clinton's candidacyand the momentum building behind Clinton was on display on Sunday. Just before Thanksgiving, the Laborers' International Union of North America offered its endorsement to Clinton and, in a statement, union president Terry O'Sullivan said the group was "eager" to work with Clinton to "promote policies that provide long-term investment in America's roads and bridges."
"Hillary Clinton understands unions," said O'Sullivan, who also spoke at the event on Sunday. "Not only understands, she supports unions. She respects unions."
Dozens of LIUNA members, wearing bright orange t-shirts, dotted the audience gathered on the first floor inside and outside the hall, joined by members of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and the International Union of Painters and Allied Craftworkers, among others.
As Walsh offered his endorsement to Clinton at the event, he called out to the union members in the room.
"Get your sledgehammers ready," he said, "because we have a glass ceiling to demolish."
Clinton's proposal for new federal spending would be in addition to "what the Congress should finally get around to authorizing," she said.
According to Clinton's campaign, her plan would be fully paid for through "business tax reform." Clinton, while she has introduced several tax credits for middle class Americans, has yet to lay out her full tax plan.

How Should the City Fund Its Labor Law Enforcement? Unions Say: Tax Businesses.


Seattles minimum wage isnt worth celebrating if workers arent getting paid what theyre owed.
Seattle's minimum wage isn't worth celebrating if workers aren't getting paid what they're owed. ALEX GARLAND
On Thursday, I wrote about a whole bunch of changes the city is likely to make to the way it enforces its labor laws. For the TL;DR crowd, the one-sentence version of the 175-page bill is this: the city is likely to get new authorities to investigate and punish employers who rip off their employees, plus those employees who get ripped off are likely to get new protections.
But there's a major footnote to all of this. The city's system of enforcing labor laws is largely complaint-based, which means workers have to know their rights in order to realize those rights are being violated. (That's why advocates have pushed for more education of workers and businesses.) Plus, even if the city gets new authority to do investigations—without waiting for complaints—it needs more investigators to do that and those cost money. The bottom line: If there's no money to make sure businesses are following all of the progressive laws Seattle is so proud of, the laws don't matter much.
That's why a coalition of labor unions and advocates is calling on the city to create a dedicated source of funding for enforcing labor laws, like the minimum wage. And they want that money to come from businesses.
Here's how things work now:
Just like other city departments, the Office of Labor Standards budget is set each year by the mayor and city council in their budget writing process. During that process, the OLS is basically competing with other departments for city money instead of having its own dedicated source of funding.
That's where the unions' plan comes in. Service Employees International Union 775, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 21, and others are proposing a fee on business that would create a dedicated pot of money just for this purpose.
Specifically, they want the city to charge businesses a penny per hour worked for each of their employees and then put that money toward 1) the Office of Labor Standards and 2) grants for nonprofits educating workers and businesses about the minimum wage and other labor laws. A penny-per-hour fee, paid on top of business license fees, would amount to $20.80 per full time employee per year. According to the unions' plan, it could generate $5 to 6 million a year.
“Wage theft is a serious crime that can happen to any worker and often targets the most vulnerable among us," says the King County Labor Council's Nicole Grant in a statement supporting the plan. "A penny is a small price to pay to make sure that when a person puts in a hard day’s work, they get the pay they are owed."
For now, this is just a proposal, but the city is looking into it. The city council's 2016 budget, which they're likely to approve next week, includes a request for a city study on different ways it could create a dedicated funding source. 
Council President Tim Burgess, one of the council members who pushed for that study, tells The Stranger he's supportive of a steady funding source, but hasn't yet taken a position on where to get the money. The penny-per-hour fee is one possibility. Another is a flat increase on the business license fee. The first would mean large businesses would pay more; the second would affect everyone equally.
Mayor Ed Murray also hasn't taken a position on this, according to his spokesperson, Viet Shelton.
With some of the city's biggest unions staking out their position, this could set up a new fight between business and labor about who should shoulder the costs of the city's progressive labor laws. The study is due back to the city council by April 1.