Thursday, May 19, 2011

We are all for charity

Charity has to be clearly defined - what does this ‘Charity’ Softball Game mean?
The Transit Workers Appreciation Day is on June 4th 2011 with a presumption of violating the IRS code in three instances. We cannot ignore, overlook or sweep it under the rug. Thus the following:
TWU LOCAL 100 HAITI RELIEF FUND
TWU Local 100 Haiti Relief Fund (the "Haiti Fund") was a segregated bank account set up by the Local in 2010 that was funded by a $50,000 donation from 80 Weth Corp (the "Building Fund") as well as donations from active and retired members for approximately $46,000. The purpose of the Haiti Fund was to make donations to organizations that provided relief to victims of the 2010 earthquake that affected Haiti.
As a result of the application of the procedures described above, we found the following:
1) There was a $50,000 donation made by Building Fund to the Haiti Fund. We could not
find evidence in the minutes of the meetings held by the Executive Board during the
Relevant Period that the Executive Board approved this donation despite the fact that the
minutes of the Executive Board meeting held on January 25,2010 requires prior approval
of the Executive Board for spending moneys from the Building Fund for operating
purposes. In this regard, Mr. Samuelsen told us that notwithstanding the fact that the
minutes do not reflect the Executive Board's approval, all members of the Executive
Board were poled for their approval and that they unanimously approved the donation.
2) The Local made a donation from the Haiti Fund of $77,983.28 on November 5, 2010 to Batay Ouvriye, a labor organization (rather than a charity) that is located in Haiti and that according to its website "www.batayouvriye.org," claimed to have been performing some relief efforts in Haiti. In this regard, we were not able to find this organization in IRS Publication 78, Cumulative List of Organizations described in Section 170(c) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, which lists organizations eligible to receive tax deductible charitable contributions.
Mr. Samuelsen explained to us that he observed a speaker from Batay Ouvriye at a Labor
Notes Convention in Detroit in April 2010 and that he was very impressed with the
speaker's description of the relief work/labor organizing model which the speaker
described at length. Mr. Samuelsen stated that when it came time to make a final decision
as to where to donate the monies left in the Haiti Fund, he decided to have them donated
to Batay Ouvriye. Mr. Samuelsen told us that he did some research on them online and
became convinced that the Local's donation was well placed with this organization. We
were not able to corroborate Mr. Samuelsen's explanation.
6
Salibello fit Broder LLP
Certified Public Accountants
In addition, the wire transfer to Batay Ouvriye was signed only by John Samuelsen.
According to TWU of America's constitution, Article XVI, Sections I and IV, and the
Local's by-laws, Articles III and VI, the president can only countersign checks and all
checks must be signed by the Local's Secretary Treasurer. Because of the fact that Israel
Rivera was removed from office before the wire transfer was issued, the wire transfer
carried only the signature of John Samuelsen; however, Mr. Samuelsen did not wait
before authorizing the wire transfer until the Executive Board had appointed a new
Secretary-Treasurer (see Article IX (a) of Local's by-laws) that could have signed the
wire transfer as well.
3) The Local made a donation from the Haiti Fund of $6,000 on April 9, 2010, to
IFCOlPastors for Peace, which according to its website "www.pastorsforpeace.org," is an
ecumenical agency whose mission is to help forward the struggles of oppressed peoples
for justice and self-determination. In this regard, we were not able to find this
organization in IRS Publication 78, Cumulative List of Organizations described in
Section 170(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, which lists organizations eligible to
receive tax-deductible charitable contributions.
With regard to this donation, Mr. Samuelsen told us that a member of the Local traveled
to Haiti and verified that the relief container was received. We were not able to
corroborate Mr. Samuelsen's explanation.
4) The Local made a donation from the Haiti Fund of $1,500 on April 29, 2010, to an
organization named "Project: Overflow", through a check made to Galapagos at DUMBO
Inc, to cover the costs of rental fees for the Galapagos Art Space for a fundraising event
termed "Haiti + love" organized by Project: Overflow. The fundraising event was
supposed to be a fashion show that would have raised moneys for Haiti. In this regard, we
were not able to find this organization in IRS Publication 78, Cumulative List of
Organizations described in Section 170(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, which
lists organizations eligible to receive tax-deductible charitable contributions.

1 comment:

  1. Here you go again.
    1.The Executive board was polled via phone call about contributing to the Haiti fund. I understand if it was not unanamous it was really close. So much for eboard approval.
    2.Batay Ouvriye is a LABOR ORGANIZATION in Haiti that does relief work in Haiti. My proof? Just look at their website. More proof? READ the article they sent to the chief just one issue ago. They detail the where, whats and hows about our generous donation. That email should answer all the questions.
    3. Haitian people were/are in dire straits is it morally right to deny them help because of procerural signature?
    4.Batay Ouvriye was a supporter of our 2005 strike. No one refused their support then. As a matter of fact we trumpeted it. Why now? Politics perhaps? Ummmmmm maybe.
    5. What matters here is that this Local helped the Haitian people when they needed help, we sent money to a brother/sister labor organization that does relief work. This organization acknowleged the receipt of the money and detailed its uses in the Chief civil service newspaper.
    6. BTW were you not the internet poster that made an issue of sending relief money to Haiti and said it was unfair that Local 100, if we sent money to Haiti should send money to every disaster around the world?
    Yes I believe that WAS you.
    Now you cast doubts on they very same actions that you wanted us to do worldwide?
    A little consistancy on your part would be apprieciated.

    ReplyDelete