Sunday, October 31, 2010

Jay H Walder 2


Dear Candidates for the New York State Governor 
Before you begin your first day in the office we write as members of the blue collar workers from the main street and we wish you consider our view point. Our view as average New Yorkers of the MTA CEO and chairman Jay H Walder is that he should no longer hold his position of leadership and we are looking for change.
Anyone who aspires to hold a position in office wants to do good and help, especially if they are holding a position in the public office and the tax payers are their boss. That person is required to offer their best to serve the public without any hinderance. However not in the case of the MTA CEO and chairman Jay H Walder. 
His policies were aimed at hurting the general public in the name and guise of cost saving. He has not increased service, and he has not enhanced any service. Also he has not brought new equipment or created new jobs for average New Yorkers but for his buddies from England at no bidding contract of $200 an hour with expenses paid.
We in the main street believe it is time to have new leadership at the MTA in January. We suggest his golden sendoff package be tied in court and challenged based on the theory that he did not improve service or productivity.

Saturday, October 30, 2010

Jay H Walder 1


Dear Candidates for the New York State Governor 
Before you begin your first day in the office we write as members of the blue collar workers from the main street and we wish you to consider our view point. Our view as average New Yorkers of the MTA CEO and chairman Jay H Walder corresponds with that of the Nassau County Executive.
We would like to remind you that the Nassau County Executive Edward Mangano believes in the removal of Jay H Walder. Since labor day, “Taxpayers deserve accountability, and for that reason, I am calling on our gubernatorial candidates to pledge new leadership at the MTA in January.” Mangano Said. “This Labor Day, families sat around the barbecue worrying about how to afford to get to work because of Walder’s mismanagement,” he said. “Earning a $350,000 salary plus a generous housing allowance, Walder has taken taxpayers for a ride.”
Many other elected officials have opined the same about Walder, and we find his tenure full of malice and hostility towards the average New Yorker. 
  • He has raised the fares which will take effect January 2011. Thus that would reflect negatively on the new governor.
  • Select Bus Service along 1st and 2nd Avenues in Manhattan, the bus stops are confusing to distinguish between a local bus stop from the select bus station and are not separate in addition the outside metro card vending machine does not accept credit cards or sell metro cards.

Friday, October 29, 2010

Labor shortage

A recent article in The Wall Street Journal was about the severe labor shortage of skilled craftsmen. The article points out that firms attempt to deal with excess demand pressures in a variety of ways but without raising wages. However wages will eventually rise in the face of a labor shortage as the supply and demand shows. Firms often respond to changing market conditions rather slowly which looks exactly like what our employer is doing.
The article states that although much attention has been focused on the growing scarcity of service workers for restaurants, hotels and stores there is a far more serious labor shortage emerging for skilled blue collar craftsmen ranging from machinists, electricians, shipbuilders and bricklayers. However one wonders why there is a shortage of those while the navy is buying tons of ships and there are tons of new buildings going up.
Companies use different tactics which we would call bait and switch because they simply want cheap labor. Some companies laid off 97 employees, but offered jobs to 30 of the workers and in the end eventually hired only two. 
Another company extended its work week to 55 hours from the usual 40. The company also offered new recruits a ‘up to’ $1,500 ‘hiring bonus’ while neglecting its long time employees’ pay increases. The company admitted that it was part of the additional costs of training and must be shared by the long time employees which is nonsense.
Given the scarcity of labor one would think that the wages of skilled craftsmen would have risen sharply as companies competed for labor. However such has not been the case, a well known labor economist opined ‘what were seeing is the legacy of last economic recession and on going pressure of foreign competition’. It is ridiculous he says that a number of companies decided to operate shorthanded or institute mandatory overtime rather than raise wages on the hope that the labor shortage would prove to be temporary. This is what is happening to us because of our employer.
A company couldn’t get anyone to answer its ads for minimum wage, so it raised its pay to $1 above the minimum wage. Then it kept raising the wage till it was $3 above the minimum wage. This scenario to some degree resembles our employer’s behavior of wanting cheap labor.

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Why wages aren’t keeping up with productivity

Several recent magazine and newspaper articles have explored that since World War II, sustained and substantial productivity increases are not being shared with workers in the form of higher wages. Instead the financial gains are going towards bolstering corporate profits or towards paying for cost saving capital investment which is exactly what our boss is doing currently.
Productivity gains lead to higher wages for workers in two ways. First is higher productivity means lower unit costs of production and eventually lower prices for the consumer. Here our employer is raising the fares in January 2011 which is opposite of that governing principle. The second is productivity gains also result in higher corporate profit. Our boss is laying off blue collar workers without justification and this is not the way to move forward. It is clear now the two candidates for governorship have indicated their interest to tear up our employer and probably make it a state agency answering directly to the governor. We the blue collar workers see no problem with that and we will not surrender our rights. We are glad to see those two candidates appear to indicate that our boss is fair game and he will get the boot. This would be poetic justice let him feel what the layoff members felt even though he has a golden sendoff package.
Our boss is intransigent for redistributing the monies from capital to the labor-operational side. His service reductions created hostility with the general public. Especially when the general public is reducing their reliance of their personal vehicles in huge number due to the cost of gas, tolls, insurance and upkeep of the vehicles while at the same time there is an increase of ridership with the demand for reliable mass public transportation. Instead our boss aims to turn a world premier transportation system to a third world transportation status. The candidates for the governorship are within their rights to seek his removal if elected and we second their views.
Since we are operating normally and we are not bankrupt then why is there a gap in the operating budget? Going after the blue collar workers was wrong and was caused by mismanagement. Our boss’ service reduction and antics have created political impact which the candidates cannot overlook if they want to get elected.
We here in why did you join the union wonder why there are no generous wages since there have been gains in productivity?

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

2%

2 percent increase (effective October 16, 2010) this has been on the minds of the membership since we have an upcoming pay period and they are wondering whether this increase will be there.
The simple answer is it should be. However when we are dealing with our employer who has a history of giving or paying out the increases in a retroactive manner there should be no surprise to see the 2% increase missing.
Samuelsen should look into this matter especially since it would benefit the membership  and assure them that it would not be delayed for some strange reasons by our employer and he should encourage the employer to meet its obligation towards the membership. Remind the employer of the Collective Bargaining Agreement between NYCTA, OA and TWU Local 100 under section 1.17 - Implementation of Arbitral Awards ...the Authorities shall comply with and effectuate the provisions of such awards forthwith...
Members of Local 100 are the motivated, loyal, obedient and the best hard working workforce in the country with the least absenteeism. They have met every productivity benchmark set up and they help to move New York. This increase is necessary and they have earned it due to the sweat of hard working men and women of Local 100 and they are entitled to it forthwith.
Members of Local 100 have accepted this 2% piece meal increase while others have had unimaginable bonus’s lavished onto them. We here in the why did you join the union salute and applaud the honorable members who give their best all the time. We move New York, we also share the USPS creed ‘We are mothers and fathers. And sons and daughters. Who every day go about our lives with duty, honor and pride. And neither snow, nor rain, nor heat, nor gloom of night, nor the winds of change, nor a nation challenged, will stay us from the swift completion of our appointed rounds. Ever.’ 

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Affirm

Good riddance, finally the executive board has found Israel Rivera Jr guilty on all charges. Therefore Israel Rivera Jr has been removed from office of secretary treasurer. It is a good day for Local 100 and a new beginning in moving forward.
We here in why did you join the union appreciate and affirm the common sense decision in rejecting corruption after a long exhaustive week. Now the file with its decision must be forwarded to the Manhattan or Bronx District Attorney in addition to filling a complaint.
Now the other side of the equation is the vacated position of the secretary treasurer must be filled immediately to remove doubt and also to make a seamless transition for the new secretary treasurer.

Monday, October 25, 2010

Paralysis by analysis

It is a lofty goal to have a fair trial for Israel Rivera Jr and good intentions from the executive board members. However it creates an impression of incompetency, by dragging it out and it fuels the fire that the executive board members are protecting Israel Rivera Jr among the general membership and it creates doubt where there is none. Whether prolonging this trial is worth the sour taste the executive board members leave among the general membership and whether this let it ride attitude is healthy for our Local 100 we need to move on. There has to be a finality and the folder must be handed to Manhattan or Bronx District Attorney.
Executive board members can not have a laissez-faire attitude. The general membership is watching and observing, and it is up to those executive board members to do their duty swiftly. This inaction is not healthy for our Local 100 when other pressing issues need the attention of those executive board members.
We would like to take this opportunity to remind those executive board members of the New York State Labor Law  Section 725  subsection 1.....Any member of such labor organization shall have the right to bring such action or proceeding if (a) after request by any member that such action or proceeding be brought, such organization shall fail to do so, or (b) such request would be futile, or (c) such organization has failed to prosecute diligently any such action or proceeding which it has brought.
Whether this carry on rises to the level of failure that which is mentioned in the subsection (c) in addition it gives the impression that we are unable to clean up the sleaze or run a clean ship. An organization as TWU Local 100 does not need to convey a message that we are troubled, dirty and rotten directly or indirectly whether intentionally or not at this precarious moment in the labor movement.
Executive board members must act expeditiously and energetically and resolve this trial. If in the event the executive board members want to be idle and inactive then we recommend that the trail should be open to the general membership. We recommend to the executive board to make a clean break and stop wasting time. Israel Rivera Jr has to be removed from the position of the secretary treasurer, disqualified from the membership of the TWU Local 100 and forward the file to the Manhattan or Bronx District Attorneys as soon as possible.
TWU Local 100 must convey the image that we are a clean organization and no thieves will be tolerated or accepted to be members.

Friday, October 22, 2010

Circus

The executive board of Local 100 has turned into a dysfunctional body in their objective to give a fair trial to Israel Rivera Jr. It has turned into a quagmire and it appears that there is no decisive, clear, level headed members to accomplish the task at hand.
Since the trial has been adjourned to monday October 25, 2010, we would recommend for the executive board members to have a spine and do their duty. Maybe during the weekend they should buy Margaret Thatcher books such as: a) The Downing Street Years b) There is no alternative.  Maybe those books will inspire those executive members to act decisively. Maybe those executive board members have given up their full responsibility easily and absolved themselves of their duty. If so then the general membership can replace the executive board and act decisively. We here in why did you join the union would like to know what assurances or guarantees there are that the executive board will act and not give way to uphold their power and responsibilities to the union.
We would like to take this opportunity to remind those executive board members of the 
New York State Labor Law  Section 725  subsection 1.....Any member of such labor organization shall have the right to bring such action or proceeding if (a) after request by any member that such action or proceeding be brought, such organization shall fail to do so, or (b) such request would be futile, or (c) such organization has failed to prosecute diligently any such action or proceeding which it has brought.
The task at hand is Israel Rivera Jr’s misdeeds that have to be decided initially and deposed afterwards. Also if there is any basis to discuss the tangent issues of bad standing, and the elected members qualification based on the dues. Imagine tug boats each pulling in a different direction then the ship will never advance forward it will be stranded and stand still. So we will remind the executive board members of subsection (c) they have to prosecute diligently - the state legislative intended the meaning of the word diligently to show that they care about the general membership.
KISS stands for Keep It Simple Stupid, everyone is aware that Samuelsen may not be able to get reelected without the second position held by a Mabstoa. That is the fact that Israel Rivera Jr is banking on to poison the well by bamboozling the trial into a different direction. However there are many Mabstoa members who are in good standing and honorable people. Samuelsen should apologize to the general membership for picking Israel Rivera Jr because he has no backing in Mabstoa.
We recommend to the executive board to make a clean break and stop wasting time. Israel Rivera Jr has to be removed from the position of the secretary treasurer, disqualified from the membership of the TWU Local 100 and forward the file to the Manhattan or Bronx District Attorneys as soon as possible.

Thursday, October 21, 2010

Guilty

We here in why did you join the union urge the executive board of Local 100 to forward this matter to the Manhattan District Attorney. Any reasonable member of his peers would find that Israel Rivera Jr has violated New York State Labor Law. 
Section 720 - abused their positions of fiduciary responsibility - guilty
subsection 1. Have or acquire any pecuniary or personal interest - guilty
subsection 2. Engage in any business or financial transaction which conflicts with his fiduciary obligation - guilty
subsection 3. Act in any way which subordinates the interest of such labor organization to his own pecuniary or personal interests - guilty
Section 723 and all its subsection - guilty
Warning for executive board we hope you are aware of New York State Labor Law 
subsection 1.....Any member of such labor organization shall have the right to bring such action or proceeding if (a) after request by any member that such action or proceeding be brought, such organization shall fail to do so, or (b) such request would  be futile, or (c) such organization has failed to prosecute diligently any such action or proceeding which it has brought
Warning and caution
We hope that Samuelsen and the executive board does not falter on this issue, or try to sweep it under the rug due to the fact that New York State Labor Law has given the right to every member of Local 100 to bring action. If the executive board wants to give Israel Rivera Jr a pass we here in why did you join the union, would initiate legal action against both.

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Disgrace

We always hear that the wheel of justice is broken and we can not pin point exactly where the wheel is broken. However in some instances we can find exactly where the wheel has broken from.
The trial of Horace Moore the murderer of the New York City Bus Operator Edwin Thomas who was murdered on December 1, 2008 - revealed how the justice wheel is broken. The wheel of justice in this case was broken by the liberal judge who failed to render proper justice. However the NYPD worked superbly as well as the district attorney who did their job amicably.
The judge meted 20 years to life jail sentence to Horace Moore who is 22 years old. For argument’s sake let's assume the murderer did the time then by age 42 he would be out. Is that a proper amount of time for a murderer? we would prefer life imprisonment without parole.
Here is where we reach the boiling point, we feel that the judge spat on our face and said our lives at best are worth 20 years. This is a place where precedent can be set for the future. Specifically a time where Samuelsen should send a clear message that members of  Local 100 lives are worth more than 20 years and the thugs on the street should know that if they murder a member of Local 100 they will do life behind bars and not 20 years. We would prefer to have a hanging judge, or even a gung ho right wing judge who could have sent Horace Moore up the river and throw away the key. Or even if we were in those states that have the capital punishment.
In this case we would also have loved to had one of Rudolph Giuliani’s tough and no nonsense judge’s who values the average hard working people of New York City. The judge may have overlooked the nature of a grisly stabbing of the bus operator Edwin Thomas the pain inflicted while he was strapped in the operator seat can not be overlooked.
Today and not tomorrow John Samuelsen must convene an emergency executive board meeting and ponder what actions should be undertaken in lieu of this liberal judge’s sentence. Samuelsen has enormous powers and those powers must be utilized now to send a clear message that we are not happy with this liberal judge’s sentence. Now is the time for Samuelsen to shine and demonstrate his leadership skills and actions. Although we understand that we are in a moral dilemma because we must respect the judge’s ruling. However we must demonstrate that we are not happy and not satisfied with this sentence. Samuelsen has infinite means that can be deployed and he must prove by deed that he truly cares for his members of Local 100.

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Phony union leader

A recent article in The New York Times discusses how a union leader was moving in a direction against the membership and undermining them, in the manner or guise of reform. We here in why did we join the union saw the identical pattern of that in our Local 100 especially in the previous leader Roger Toussaint. However the current leadership of Samuelsen a Toussaint protege and loyalist the goals are still fuzzy and not clear.
Even in Hollywood they referred to a phony and out of date union leader as seen in the  movie ‘Waiting for Superman’. The movie clearly sends a message that this leader, first is harming the children and secondly is harming the members who are supposed to get protection. Finally the third message is that our schools have become dismal and has the worst failures worldwide at the education level.
There have been numerous reports regarding achievement that show peers that are 15 years old in the USA are below average in applying reading, mathematics, and science skills into tasks compared to students from around the world. The number of high school drop outs has sky rocketed currently and that relates and adds woes to the current unemployment figures. Since education contributes directly to the economy and the economy is in downward spiral everyone has a right to worry. Thus they are showing this phony union leader in the movie ‘Waiting for Superman’ to bring about change.
So how is it related to Local 100 since we are far from the education field? We here in why did you join the union observe the similarity of decisions. How the decision making process was undertaken by the Toussaint and possibly to some by his protege and loyalist Samuelsen that have caused harm to the membership. However we would like to caution Samuelsen that he has time on his side and should not undertake policies that would undermine the membership or put them in an unfavorable position. Whether Samuelsen would continue to reach out to the disaffected membership to seek common ground is unknown but it is up to him to make the right choices.

Monday, October 18, 2010

Sentencing

The trial of Horace Moore the murderer of New York City Bus Operator Edwin Thomas who was murdered on December 1, 2008 began Monday 9/27/10
At Kings County Supreme 
Criminal Division
320 Jay street,
Brooklyn NY 11201
19 Floor Part 27
Sentencing day Tuesday October 19, 2010
Sentencing time 9:00 AM
Verdict - guilty
Sentence ?
Would prefer the maximum penalty life imprisonment without parole
It is very important to impress upon the judge with a huge number of members to show up, we need to fill the court to it's capacity.
We must show solidarity to the family of the late bus operator Edwin Thomas - who has paid ultimate sacrifice while doing his work.

Second chance

Our suspicions are that Samuelsen may not use the road of the well beaten track. Well what is the basis for Samuelsen new pick for secretary treasurer, and what are the criteria? However before looking forward lets look backward and assess Samuelsen’s decision in picking the future felon Israel Rivera Jr who came out of a muddy sole. We wonder if Samuelsen’s next pick would be better but maybe the membership is expecting too much of him.
Lets look at Israel Rivera Jr whose talents will land him in Rikers Island and whose writing is almost illiterate. It is Samuelsen who has picked an illiterate for the second highest position in the Local 100. Now begs the question are we restricted to illiterates who turn felons and are peddled to us as geniuses? It is obvious that Israel Rivera Jr was the worst choice and it was Samuelsen who appeared to make blunder after blunder by choosing him. Imagine if Samuelsen was a driver and had multiple accidents then the insurance company would drop their coverage because the insurance company is in the business of making money not losing it.
So the membership comes out on the losing end of the stick but with his second chance we hope Samuelsen will bring the best person whose conduct towards the membership they can benefit. We will challenge him and we are not going to follow him blindly maybe that will bring the best out of Samuelsen. However we have found out a squalid piece of gossip that the next secretary treasurer might be one of the two following disastrous choices either Charles Jenkins or Joe Bermudez. We say they should not even make the threshold of consideration. It is rumored now that it is their turn to ascend the ladder and we are not sure of how they will bring about positive change to Local 100. It is obvious that Samuelsen, if he made these two choices or if they are under consideration at best because they are yes man who follow whatever he says. We have already seen the choice of the solidarity fund overseer team and nothing surprises us anymore when it comes to Samuelsen’s blindness borders of madness.
It confirms our suspicions that we are heading for no great changes in the Local 100. We advise that Samuelsen put the membership’s benefit ahead of his yes men. He will be an effective leader if he keeps the membership well being at all times. Samuelsen should sense the enormity of the next choice and we are not expecting a miracle but a change towards a better union. Therefore we hope that Samuelsen will not move backward but forward for the membership well being. We have faith in him and hope he considers only the best possible people that can improve Local 100.

Friday, October 15, 2010

Young Adult Children

We here in why did you join the union are pleased to hear that our employer will comply with the federal laws specifically the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that covers the young adult children until they turn 26 years old.
This is great news for the members who at once felt aggrieved when their children were dropped by our employer. We hope that their children will stay healthy and also get greater protection in the event that they get sick.
However, as we know human beings are known to covet which is not approved according to the tenth commandment which states ‘thou shalt not covet’. Therefore we do not want the members of to feel that they have to covet healthcare that others get for their children. As a result we will aspire to acquire affordable quality health care for the children of the members of the Local 100.
Now New York State law provides for young adults to stay on their parents’ plan up to the age of 29. We here in why did you join the union would recommend that Samuelsen encourage our employer to adhere to New York State law due to the fact that it provides longer and greater coverage for young adult children.
We all wish for easy answers to what should be affordable quality health care and universal coverage for our children. But it’s not that easy with our employer.

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Unions were necessary

Well we have heard the saying that Unions were necessary and most recently we heard it from our boss and the management who stated that ‘Unions were necessary when they started, but now they have gone too far’. This statements simply refers to the  wage concessions. We here in why did you join the union do not agree with the employers point of view and we hope Samuelsen does not falter on his promises.
We remind Samuelsen to take a careful look at what happened in the union wage concession in the auto industry which is the clearest example that shows a negative slope. In addition the same is seen in the series of wage concessions that were agreed to by the unions in the auto, rubber, steel, trucking and airline industries. In each case wage concessions were made in the face of events or developments that caused the demand for union labor to become more elastic thus threatening large losses in employment and union membership especially if there wasn’t any wage relief.
We do not agree with the employers point of view completely and Samuelsen must consider what has happened to the auto industry. Wage concessions were made first by the United Automobile Workers (UAW) with Chrysler, which was then followed by concessions with Ford and General Motors (GM). As a result the UAW have to make record breaking ‘give backs’ after a decade of below average wage gains. 
Those at the UAW could not see that the auto prices kept going up while the wages were at a standstill and therefore we remind Samuelsen about the projected fare increase of January 2011 and we are not going to be swayed with any bankrupt employer rhetoric. Also with the argument that the fix we are in has much to do with the national economic downturn and that our employer should be granted concession as a result doesn’t make sense and we here in the why did you join the union say no to that argument.
When our retirement and personal stock market accounts go down in value us employees don’t cry or whine about it. Instead we take it in stride. That is the way the market is and what is good for the goose is also good for the gander.
Employment has not grown with our employer. In fact we lost over one thousand members of Local 100 to the lay offs and that has reduced our numbers in the membership. Until we regain our original number of the membership to 39,000, and substantially exceed the average rate of wage increase in the economy and raise wages with no employment losses from raising wages then may we talk to the employer to see if there is a venue to moderate but otherwise no.

All members are prospective retirees!

All Local 100 members are prospective retirees! If you screw former Local 100 members then you also screw current Local 100 members. A recent article in The New York Times released on Wednesday by the Empire Center for New York State Policy highlighted reports that there is no money for retiree health cost.
Number one in giving empty promises to the retirees is New York City, number two is New York State, and number three is our employer. There are ‘professional economists’ who are opposing promised retirees health care costs and there are legions of others that are on the other side of the issue. What weighs heavily with us is that for nearly a quarter of a century those opposing promised retirees health care costs have held to their belief and the disastrous results speak for themselves.
Empire Center for New York State Policy has the right to their opinion and we respect that. If they decide not to have their family members participating and benefiting from any retirees health care programs then that is their right. But why must they impose their will on the rest of us by almost denying those who want and indeed demand this type of retirees health care for their own family members. That cannot be tolerated.
By our own count, all members of Local 100 want the retirees health care and should be  given the opportunity to benefit from such a program. We here in why did you join the union have heard numerous complaints from the current and retiree members facing difficulties in attaining health care for their family members. We look at those members as if they were our own family members, and feel that their families should be entitled to have health care coverage.
Samuelsen will be held accountable if in the 2012 contract he screws retirees health care. However he has steered the ship in the right direction recently and based on his good government role we hope he will indeed help out the retirees of Local 100.  He has the type of good government role like that of Fiorello LaGuardia and hopefully it is not a ploy. Hopefully he maintains his new style of leadership and we will take the role of Fiorello LaGuradia rather than the morals of Plunkitt of Tammany Hall. Good intentions and worthy goals is not what we are looking for but for the retirees to get the health care that was promised to them.

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Life on the line

A recent article in The New York Times discussed deterioration in working conditions and safety levels in meat packing plants, whether the individual worker has equal bargaining power to the employer or not what are the disadvantages. Lets take a look at meatpacking industry in its relentless pursuit to cut labor cost, it is important for the workers to band together to protect themselves from resulting decline in wages and working conditions - sounds similar to our situation with our employer and the new boss.
Many of meatpacking plants are, unionized although these tend to be the older, high cost facilities. A question that bothers the mind is why the union that represents the meatpacking workers are unable to protect the wages and working conditions of its members?
Although modern machinery has changed the look and sound of packing house the industry remains one of the most grisly and hazardous. Meatpackers work in extreme heat or refrigerated cold often standing shoulder to shoulder wielding razor sharp knives and saws. Grease and blood make the floors and tools slippery and the roar of machines constant - sound familiar to the members in the maintenance. 
After years of steady improvement in wages and working conditions, life in the packing house has become worse for workers in recent years. According to the article contributing factors are automation intense competition in the industry weakened unions and diminished health and safety regulation.
To illustrate the problems facing the packing house workers the reporter visited the Sioux Falls, SD hog slaughtering plant of the Morrell Company. One long time worker there said when he started they killed 365 hogs an hour at the plant, but that every time the company management gets a chance, they crank up the speed of the chain that carries the carcasses past the workers station. These days the union reported, the hog chain moves 1,065 head per hour allowing workers 3.4 seconds to do their job before they must start again.
Workers at the plant said that production got faster, attention to safety concerns slipped badly. One day 4 years earlier for example Richard Krier a mechanic in the plant went down into the pit of freight elevator shaft to make repairs. in the past he said the elevator would have been shut down. Now however with the production line racing so fast there was no time. He said to the reporter ‘They holler at you - you get that thing going, it’s costing us a lot of bucks to have that thing down.’ As Richard worked therefore the elevator next to him kept going. When the elevator went up a 10,000 pound counterweight came down, inches away from him. A mesh guard separating the two elevator shafts was missing and on one pass the counterweight crushed his left arm. Three and half months after the accident, the company had not yet put a guard on the counterweight.
Another worker, Tim Denherder, told a different story about dangers of working in the plant, at 28, he already has carpal tunnel syndrome, a blockage of the channel that carries the nerve to the hand that comes from moving parts of the body repetitively, at the pace of the machine, in many departments at Morell, half the workers say they have carpal tunnel symptoms. On the chain workers say it is not unusual to see people  forcing their fingers open in the morning and then forcing them back to grip the handle of a knife or saw for the day. Denherder said his grip is so weak that he can not pick up his children and carry them up to bed.
As workers see it therefore, the competitive shake out in the industry is pressing down on their wages and working conditions. To an outside observer the solution for workers is a simple one - quit Morrell and get a different job. Sound familiar to our situation here  in Local 100. The article explains however that for many of the Morrell workers this option is not as easy as it seems. 

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

Larry Hanley congratulations

We congratulate the Amalgamated Transit Union for electing Larry Hanley as president. He deserves his win and the Amalgamated Transit Union will definitely benefit with his forward looking strategies and thinking. 
We here in why did you join the union appreciate his wisdom in seeking input and discussion from the membership. Specifically for a $5 voluntary contribution that was accepted widely by the ATU membership with open hearts.
We assume Samuelsen wanted to copy your accomplishment and wanted to show you that he can do better. That’s why he got the executive board to shove the $5 assessment down the throats of all the membership. However he overlooked your strategy which took months of discussions. Also how you earned the goodwill of the ATU membership voluntarily and how you respected those who declined to contribute without arousing rancor. We believe now he has learned the lesson of his toxic decision and that the membership resents it. It is our belief that ‘if you want to gather honey, don't kick over the beehive’ and imposing his will on the rest of us by denying those who dissent or oppose it. That cannot be tolerated and shows how troubled the Local 100 has become.
We encourage you Larry Hanley to call Samuelsen frequently and spare him some of your wise advice. Advise him that he has to let go of those hangers on, those cowards,  backstabbers and used up car salesmen. Instead he should seek forward looking strategies for the benefit of the membership. 
We know Samuelsen is full of pride, and is a sincere and loyal person. Those qualities are in effect his weaknesses because it blinds his judgement as a leader by allowing himself to be swayed by his buddies. He has to look at what is required for the membership as a whole to be an effective leader. Therefore Mr. Hanley with your wisdom you can counsel him frequently and please do bring him a gift, a book by Dale Carnegie titled How to win friends & influence people. Also let him know that instead of setting our sights to rival with other unions we have to focus on changing Local 100 into the best union possible. 
Bus operator Larry Hanley advice Samuelsen to end this assessment in six months time due to the fact that there are members of the executive board that want to extend this toxic assessment and undermine him for a year which will lead to turmoil in this chaotic toxic environment. We also seek that you should advice him that he should reach out to the membership and let them know that there was no malice behind his toxic decision.

Monday, October 11, 2010

Jail


sectreas_scan117.jpg
When Izzy Rivera was elected he had no backing from Mabstoa, and he was carried by John Samuelsen. Rivera should have been thankful and he should have appreciated the high leadership position that he was afforded with a very large 'lulu' (a euphemism for salary). In addition he should have appreciated all the perks, power, patronage and the benefits that came with the opportunity to serve the membership. He should have had the intentions to render pro bono publico service.
That would have been the ideal situation however now he finds he has been accused of heinous acts that will lead to jail time. But all of a sudden, the importance of the title of secretary treasurer is becoming crystal-clear. In recent weeks, thank god he was locked out of his office as a preventive and prudent measure against being allegedly accused of being a thief who has no place in our Local 100. They have halted many or all of his duties in the wake of allegations of sloppiness, shortcuts, fraud, thievery, false statements, and failure to disclose information. A potential nightmare situation has emerged that has spooked not only the membership but the executive board as well. 
He failed to maintain the integrity, ethics, and professional standards of the secretary of treasurer office. Now he is in a disciplinary proceeding, and we here in why did you join the union do not agree with the executive board affording Israel Rivera Jr his pay whereas the general membership if they are in a similar situation they would not be  afforded the same courtesy. That would be a double standard. We urge the executive board to convene an emergency meeting to disqualify him from the membership of Local 100 as well as temporarily stop his pay until things are cleared up. The matter should be in the hands of the Manhattan District Attorney or Bronx District Attorney so that a criminal investigation could be undertaken to find out the truth of the matter. Rather than having positions being used for personal gain, which was exactly what occurred in this instance.
The ethically challenged Israel Rivera Jr soon-to-be imprisoned and a future felon, has no ties to Mabstoa and presents no evidence of any interest in Local 100 issues. It didn't surprise anyone when he points fingers elsewhere. His outrageous affront wasn't a simple error and really reflected the beliefs he has which is an out-and-out deliberate insult. Or maybe it is a 'Freudian slip' that reveals some other agenda lurking deep in the subconscious.
Israel Rivera Jr as more time passes the more one has to come to the conclusion that the soft spoken image is nothing more than a con artist who conned John Samuelsen and a willing group of naive, ecumenically minded members (the Kumbaya crowd) into believing that he is an honorable member. His hands are dirty and he has a hell of a nerve trying to imply otherwise.

Friday, October 8, 2010

"Age 29" Dependent Coverage Extension

Federal Law
H.R. 3590 Enrolled, section 1001 (adding section 2714 to the Public Health Service Act): "A group health plan and a health insurance issuer offering group or individual health insurance coverage that provides dependent coverage of children shall continue to make such coverage available for an adult child (who is not married) until the child turns 26 years of age."
New York State Law
___________
Introduced by Sen. BRESLIN -- (at request of the Governor) -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Rules
AN ACT to amend the insurance law, in relation to the provision of health insurance coverage to the unmarried child of an insured through the age of twenty-nine years


Now there is no excuse because the laws have been enacted at the federal and State level and many members of Local 100 who have adult children that don’t have any coverage feel wronged by Samuelsen.  Samuelsen has failed to champion this cause.
This is a win-win situation for Samuelsen and TBOU because if he can get the employer to comply with either law that will allows young adults to continue health coverage under their parents group insurance policy up to the age of 29. This would be possible since the coverage provided to the young adult would be the same as coverage provided to the employee - in this case the parent.
There is cause for concern that Samuelsen may not be interested in this issue and that  will only reveal more dissatisfaction from the membership and a lack of trust in his leadership. We offer the analogy of the New York Mets, which just deep sixed their manager and general manager after yet another losing season. Samuelsen has had a worse season than even the Mets and deserves the same fate as Omar Minaya and Jerry Manuel. There is much more at stake than just a game: the future of our membership’s well being and Local 100 is on the line.

Thursday, October 7, 2010

Stations

A station agent was upset and could not understand why Samuelsen and TBOU went on a picnic on July 31 to Great Adventure costing the Local 100 a huge amount of money. She questions why those funds were not utilized to provide health care insurance for the laid off brethren? It is a valid point why blow off millions for junket.
We explained that the monies spent for the family day were not refundable. She countered that those tickets could have been sold to a ticketing agent like Ticketmaster and allowing for a recoup at minimum 70% of the original price. Then that amount could have been used to aid the laid off brethren with their health insurance coverage. However she feels that blowing off monies for fun is an indicative of faulty leadership.
We advised her Samuelsen as president of Local 100 has to travel in first class to conventions and functions and she fumed. He has to use the Greyhound bus in order to see how people struggle in their daily life. Then he may realize his assessment decision was incorrect.
She pointed to 2012 and claimed ‘anybody but Samuelsen’ and that ‘Samuelsen has to go’. She added that she has her children who are young adults in college and they do not have health coverage  and that no one is helping her. Although the law has been passed for coverage of young adults up to the age of 23 can be covered for under their parents insurance. She wondered why Samuelsen is not championing that cause. 
She added that she wrote the employer asking that there should be no reduction to her pay check however she was mad when she received a response that does not agree with her wishes. She claimed that with her children going back to school with rising expenses it is tough for her to make ends meet. She feels like Samuelsen is taking her pay check monies and she said that she does not want to hear that name no more. So we say ‘no more Samuelsen’.

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

Trial time

The trial of Horace Moore the murderer of New York City Bus Operator Edwin Thomas who was murdered on December 1, 2008 began Monday 9/27/10
At Kings County Supreme 
Criminal Division
320 Jay street,
Brooklyn NY 11201
19 Floor Part 27
Thursday trial time 9:00 AM
It is very important to impress upon the judge with a huge number of members to show up, we need to fill the court to it's capacity.
We must show solidarity to the family of the late bus operator Edwin Thomas - who has paid ultimate sacrifice while doing his work.

Rapid Transit Operations

The members of that division have spearheaded a campaign against the Samuelsen assessment ‘Solidarity Fund’ by petitioning the employer. They state that they did not consent to this solidarity fund and that they did not agree to a deduction from their pay checks.
Steve Downs chair of the train operators claimed that he has the backing of all train operators agreeing to a one year deduction from their pay checks. If that is accurate then why would the members of that division petition the employer?  Clearly the membership are not happy and those officers do not have the backing of their membership.
Couple of train operators chimed in that Steve Downs is useless and a waste of space. They questioned what about the Haiti Earthquake Relief Fund, how they delivered the monies to Haiti, whether Samuelsen and TBOU threw the money in the air and whether it landed in Haiti by itself?
We inquired why they did not vote against the assessment and they replied that they did vote against the assessment. However they question the whole voting process and they do not believe that less than 10% of the membership have a right to impose the assessment compared to the rest. They also demanded that if any assessment in the future be levied on the membership it should be based on 51% of the general membership. In addition that the voting should be made by paper so it can be verified and if necessary challenged.
In addition they do not agree with Steve Downs’ point of view that this assessment should be for a year long and if he is looking for alliances from other executive board members so as to have the numbers to extend this toxic assessment. Thus they promised for that he would not be the chair of train operators division for long, he won the division narrowly, they added they need a leader not an informative.

Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Thank you NYPD

The trial of Horace Moore the murderer of New York City Bus Operator Edwin Thomas who was murdered on December 1, 2008 began Monday 9/27/10
At Kings County Supreme 
Criminal Division
320 Jay street,
Brooklyn NY 11201
19 Floor Part 27
Tuesday trial time 9:00 AM
We appreciate and salute NYPD for their fine job. It is very important to impress upon the judge with a huge number of members to show up, we need to fill the court to it's capacity.
We must show solidarity to the family of the late bus operator Edwin Thomas - who has paid ultimate sacrifice while doing his work.

Amnesty

30% of the membership are in bad standing. Therefore we recommend that there be an amnesty for those who are in bad standing. 
Some of those who are in bad standing claimed that they will never bring themselves to good standing for some reason or the other. Some of those reasons are reasonable especially for those associated with sickness or medical conditions. However to move forward as a strong union without acrimony Samuelsen should think of granting amnesty to the members that are in bad standing.
Since Samuelsen has a soft spot for illness, sickness and medical conditions then here is one way to demonstrate that he truly cares by doing the right thing. The members who have paid their dues and who are in good standing will understand that.

Monday, October 4, 2010

Consolidation

The Implementation Agreement - OA/TA Surface Consolidation was signed on August 25, 2003 by Roger Toussaint who was president of TWU Local 100 then. This was not a well thought out agreement because it was only advantageous to the employer at the cost of the employees.
The concept of a Regional Bus Company is a great one however consolidation of the separate entities always comes at the cost to the employees. The question is why did the former president, his lieutenants and loyalists agree with the consolidation without having the concept of Regional Bus Company come to fruition? 
There is no question the concept of a Regional Bus Company is a fantastic idea that can cover New York City, Long Island and Westchester. Why agree to merge the bus divisions, which run as two separate companies? The TA Surface is covered by the Civil Service Laws whereas MaBSTOA is not. Were Toussaint and his loyalists not able to see the elephant in the room?
There is no question the merger - consolidation cost employees their jobs as well as their overtime. This can be clearly seen by fast forwarding to this year (2010) with the great number of layoffs. Since MaBSTOA does not have the protection of the Civil Service Laws its employees were annihilated in the layoffs. Samuelsen a Toussaint protege and loyalist claims he has a lawsuit pending in court regarding the layoffs. According to Samuelsen the layoffs should be based on the consolidation list with the ratio one to one from TA and OA, it is a great theory but it has no standing, layoffs ratios was not covered in the implementation agreement.
When one goes to court, one must be on the right but is wronged in some way and thus the courts uses its power to bring the injured party as a whole. Here in our lawsuit one can only predict the outcome based on the evidence present: 1) Implementation Agreement, 2) Civil Service Laws, 3) economy downturn - a reasonable jurist will conclude it's water over the dam.
There has never been a lawsuit recently filed that has brought significant accomplishment to the benefit of the employees especially from our Local 100. Thus Samuelsen’s lawsuit rhetoric becomes meaningless. We can predict what the outcome of the lawsuit will be. 
Then why utilize the dwindling resources and energy of the local 100 to a fruitless endeavor? We demand that Samuelsen and TBOU limit this wasteful spending chasing after red herring because there is no lawyer in the world who will tell you that you can’t win. Imagine if those funds were used to play the lottery then our chance of winning the jackpot would be 1 in 45 million. Winning that jackpot would cure all of Local 100’s ills and if we lose we would have done good because the lottery revenue will be distributed to school districts aiding education which is a good deed. However going to court and coming out on the losing end is not the right thing to do because it harms the membership! 

Sunday, October 3, 2010

Solidarity

The trial of Horace Moore the murderer of New York City Bus Operator Edwin Thomas who was murdered on December 1, 2008 began Monday 9/27/10
At Kings County Supreme 
Criminal Division
320 Jay street,
Brooklyn NY 11201
19 Floor Part 27
Monday trial time 10:00 AM
Be mentally prepared now it is the defense time, they will try to paint the murderer as a saint and the deceased as a monster. It is very important to impress upon the judge with a huge number of members to show up, we need to fill the court to it's capacity.
We must show solidarity to the family of the late bus operator Edwin Thomas - who has paid ultimate sacrifice while doing his work.

Friday, October 1, 2010

Decision

Samuelsen made the worst decision in the assessment of the solidarity fund. His decision has created animosity, hostility and a rift between brothers and sisters. It is clear that the decision was of linear thinking. Samuelsen claims that he has received accolades from overseas however it has torn the cohesiveness fiber of the membership.
In a recent meeting that ended as chaotic in the face of Samuelsen, who retreated, was visibly shaken and shocked as the members went at each others throats. We wonder if this was Samuelsen’s intention to create animosity among the membership. A retired member quipped he has never seen such animosity among the membership in his 35 years of service.
Forces were out at play with those Samuelsen lackeys, and those who oppose the assessment - divided. In addition there were other forces that materialized, as the retired member mentioned that it is not a good sign what occurred in that meeting. Whether the union leadership will remain and whether it will garner the majority of the rank and file goodwill is put into question as a result.
It was obvious Samuelsen during the chaotic session was unable to face the issues and present them. Maybe it was due to fatigue of a long day, however the underlying question remains, whether this assessment is worth this hostility between the brothers and sisters. 
Now we have devolved to a point where there is a lack of respect among the membership and the tone among the membership has turned toxic. We demand Samuelsen pay close attention to this toxic environment and we demand he seek the membership input. His curt behavior have not been successful, it is unfortunate that his inner circle has led him astray and now he has to learn the hard way. Imagine if he was a manager of New York Yankees what would the late owner George Steinbrenner have said about him?
Samuelsen should promote policies that are for the common good that would promote unity and harmony among the membership. Those policies should increase the membership’s well being while at the same time insuring both the survival and growth of the union as an institution. We believe he has learned a lesson and he has seen first hand what his decision has produced. However his promise that this assessment will not continue beyond the six month period should be taken with a grain of salt.
We know things tend to change and people tend to changes their minds however we would like to know whether Samuelsen’s opinion will hold steadfast in the fourth month, and the fifth month, and the eleventh hour in ending this assessment in six months. Some decisions of his may mean well but they fuel antagonism among the brethren and they may be costly. We encourage Samuelsen use lateral, convergent thinking based on the pros-vs-cons reasoning and abandon creating discord among the membership.